Review of Psychological Study on Crisis Negotiation

Jianqing LIU

Abstract


The crisis negotiation is a law enforcement action to remove the threat of hijackers and rescue hostages in a peaceful way. The essence of successful crisis negotiation is effective communication. About forty years of practical experience and empirical research on crisis intervention show that the way of communication is better than that of the tactical attack; the personality traits of a negotiator, such as emotional stability, empathic ability, divergent thinking mode, etc., have an important influence; the hijackers are characterized with emotionality, criminality and spirituality in diversified motivations, and paranoid type and abnormalism in personality and behavioral characteristics; the hostages may appear specific subconscious self-defense reaction of Stockholm syndrome during the crisis; and the successful negotiator shall be the combination of police and clinical psychologist with rich practical experience, and be the “psychologist with gun” with an effective confrontation to the hijackers and crisis events.

Based on early practice and theoretical model of crisis negotiation, this article focuses on reviewing and analyzing the communication techniques such as active listening, self-exposure and role playing in crisis negotiation, characteristics and psychological reactions of hijackers and hostages, and personalities and behavioral characteristics of negotiators and selection and training programs of negotiators.

 


Keywords


Crisis negotiation; Negotiation skill; Negotiation expert; Stockholm Syndrome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Charles, L. L. (1999). A disarming conversation: Creating critical incident change in a crisis negotiation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(10A), 3341.

Hacker, F. J. (1976). Crusaders, criminals, crazies: Terror and terrorism in our time. New York: W. W. Norton & Co..

Hancerli, S. (2005).Toward successful negotiation strategies in hostage situations: Case study approach and future recommendations. Masters Abstracts International, 44, 1216.

Lanceley, F. J. (1999). On-scene guide for crisis negotiators. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Rogan, R. G., & Hammer, M. R. (1995). Assessing message affect in crisis negotiations: An exploratory study. Human Communication Research, 21, 553-573.

Soskis, D. A., &Van Zandt, C. R. (1986). Hostage and negotiation: Law enforcement’s most effective nonlethal weapon. Behavioral Science & Law, 4, 423-435.

Strentz, T. (1995). The cyclic crisis negotiation time line. Law and Order, March, 73-76.

Van Hasselt, V. B., & Romano, S. J. (2008). Role-playing: Applications in hostage and crisis negotiation skill training. Behavior Modification, 32, 248-263.

Wardlaw, G. (1984). The psychologist’s role in hostage negotiations. The Police Chief, 51, 56-58.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Jianqing LIU

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Remind

We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected],or  [email protected]  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture