Mental Stress, Psychological State and Coping Style During the COVID-19

Xiuyun GONG

Abstract


It is a necessary for modern crisis management to understand public response to behavior under the condition of COVID-19. The 2002 questionnaires were designed to investigate mental stress, psychological states and coping styles of the public during the period of the COVID-19. The three scales were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis, and the factors influencing mental state were regressed in layers. The structural equation model of mental pressure, mental state and coping style was established, The hypothesis is verified, that is, health, less income, work can not be completed, marriage conflicts, family conflicts, media reports on the COVID-19 increase the public panic; public panic significantly increases their positive and negative coping behaviors. Finally, five suggestions are put forward.


Keywords


Mental stress; Psychological state; Coping style; Structural equation model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armfiled, J. M. (2006). Cognitive vulnerablity: A model of the etiology of fear. Clinical Psychology Review, (6), 746-768

Burns, W. J., & Slovic, P. (2012). Risk perception and behavior: Anticipating and responding to crises. Risk Analysis, (4), 579-582.

Douglas. M., & Wildavsky, A. (2016). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmented dangers. University of California Press.

Gierlach, E., Belsher, B. E., & Beutler, L. E. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in risk perceptions of disasters. Risk Analysis, 30(10), 1539-1549．

Jia, J. M., et al. (2008). Comparative analysis of risk perception of people in the severely and non-severely affected areas of Wenchuan earthquake. Management Review, (12), 4-9.

Kasperson, J. X., Kaperson, R. E., Pidgeon, N., et al. (2003). The social amplification of risk: Assessing fifteen years of research and theory. The Social Amplification of Risk, (1), 13-46．

Li, H. Q., et al. (2009). Public risk perception and emergency management in sudden disasters. Management World, (6), 52-60

Peters, E. M., Burraston, B., Mertz, C. K. (2004). An emotion－based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: Cognitive appraisals of emotion，affective reactivity，worldviews，and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1349-1367．

Sacco, K., Galletto, V., & Blanzieri, E. (2003). How has the 911 terrorist attack influenced decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(9), 1113-1127.

Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11814

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or [email protected] for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture