Canadian Social Science
Reconciling Institutions With Presidential Skills: A Framework Designed Throw a Metaphor Resource
Abstract
Context factors and institutional aspects have dominated explanations of republic multiparty regimes, especially in developing countries. However, given the various events of high instability and institutional fragility that these countries are going through, theoretical arguments are insufficient to understand the new scenarios. In this article, we make two main arguments. First, the strategies and profile of presidential terms will only be effectively detected with the help of a skill set demonstrated or acquired by presidents. Second, the interpretation of multiparty presidentialism can be better conceived through a systemic theoretical construct. As a method, we propose the application of an integrative framework with the help of the heuristic resource of the metaphor. Using the Brazilian case as support, the inclusion of the presidential skills approach and application of the integrative framework allowed us to connect, illustrate and better understand the dynamic profile of multiparty political systems.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abranches, S. (2018). Presidencialismo de coalizão: Raízes e evolução do modelo político brasileiro. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Alkan, A. (2021). Barber’s Typological Analysis of President Erdogan and President Putin. Psychology And Education, 58(4), 1025-1033.
Ames, B. (2001). The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Amorim Neto, O. (2019). Cabinets and coalitional presidentialism. In B. Ames (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Brazilian politics. New York: Routledge.
Arana Araya, I. (2021). The personalities of presidents as independent variables. Political Psychology, 42, 695-712.
Arana Araya, I., & Guerrero Valencia, C. (2020). Executive-legislative relations: When do legislators trust the president? In M. Alcántara, M. García Montero, & C. Rivas Pérez (Eds.), Politics and Political Elites In Latin America. Springer, Cham.
Araújo, V., Freitas, A., & Vieira, M. (2018). La lógica presidencialista en la formación de gobierno en las democracias latinoamericanas. Revista De Ciencia Política, 38(1), 25-50.
Calvo, E., Guarnieri, F. H. E., & Limongi, F. (2015). Why Coalitions? Party system fragmentation, small party bias, and preferential vote in Brazil. Electoral Studies, 39, 219-229.
Campello, D. (2022). Cuando la incompetencia se une a la mala suerte: el tercer año de Bolsonaro en la presidencia de Brasil. Revista de Ciencia Política, 42(2).
Cockerham, A. G., Driscoll, A., & Joseph, J. V. (2019). “Going Public” in Comparative Perspective: Presidents’ Public Appeals under Pure Presidentialism. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 49, 258-279.
Deluga, R. J. (1998). American presidential proactivity, charismatic leadership, and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 265-292.
Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 339-363.
García-Sánchez, M., & Rodríguez-Raga, J. C. (2019). Personality and an Internal Enemy: Understanding the Popularity of Álvaro Uribe, 2002-2010. Revista Latinoamericana De Opinión Pública, 8(2), 89-123.
Inácio, M. (2018). Centro Presidencial en Brasil. In J. Lanzaro (Ed.), Centro Presidencial: Presidenciasy Centros de Gobierno en América Latina.Estados Unidos y Europa. Madrid: Tecnos.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Limongi, F., & Figueiredo, A. C. (2017). The Brazilian political crisis and the institutional debate. Novos Estudos Cebrap, 36(3), 79-98.
Lyons, M. (1997). Presidential character revisited. Political Psychology, 18, 791-811.
Mainwaring, S. (2022). Democracy in Brazil: Change, Continuity, and Crisis. Latin American Research Review, 57(4), 936-947.
Nam, K., & Lee, S.-Y. (2021). Presidential Leadership Qualities and Their Influence on Trust in Government. Journal of Policy Studies, 36(3), 37-54.
Neustadt, R. (1991). Presidential power and the modern presidents. New York: The Free Press.
Pereira, C., & Orellana, S. (2009). Hybrid political institutions and governability: The budgetary process in Brazil. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 1(3), 57-79.
Raile, Eric D, Pereira, C., & Power, T. (2011). The executive toolbox: Building legislative support in multiparty presidential regime. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 323-334.
Rottinghaus, B., & Johnson, I. (2021). Presidential ‘Pitches’ and White House Pressure: Interpersonal Presidential Persuasion in a Shared Lawmaking Environment. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 47, 5-26.
Silvester, J., & Wyatt, M. (2022). Personality, politics and strong democracy: A review of research and future directions. In A. Weinberg (Ed.), Psychology of democracy: of the people, by the people, for the people (pp. 25-51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2006). Presidential IQ, openness, intellectual brilliance, and leadership: Estimates and correlations for 42 US chief executives. Political Psychology, 27(4), 511-526.
Smolinski, R., & Xiong, Y. (2020). In search of master negotiators: A negotiation competency model. Negotiation Journal, 36, 365-388.
Turner, M. (2015). The origin of ideas: blending, creativity and the human spark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/13057
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or [email protected] for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
