Attentional Bias on Different Emotional Valence Information: Among College Students With Different Implicit Aggression

Ke ZHANG, Dajun ZHANG

Abstract


The study is a preliminary exploration on attentional bias among college students of different implicit aggression, by using different emotional valence pictures as experimental materials and dot-probe paradigm, as well as employing The Single Category Implicit Association Test which results was found being positively related to the self-reports of participants and also being consistent with the behavior of them. The experimental results show that attentional bias of college students in different implicit aggression do not be changed with the pictures of different emotional valence. But it is found that there is the significant difference between the Stimulus Onset Asynchrony and the participants of different implicit aggression during the experiments as well.


Keywords


Self/evaluative implicit aggression; The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT); attentional bias; Dot-probe paradigm; Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bai, L., Ma, H., Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2006). The development of native Chinese affective picture system—A pretest in 46 college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19(11), 719-722.

Bradley, B., Field, M., Mogg, K., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: Component processes of biases in visual orienting. Behavioural Pharmacology, 15(1), 29-36.

Chen, S. A., Yang, Z. L., & Liu, S. Z. (1996). Experiments concerning the social cognition of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 19(2), 75-78, 127.

Cui, L. J., & Zhang, G. C. (2004). The studies of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Psychological Science, 27(1), 161-164.

Dai, Q., & Feng, Z. Z. (2008). Attentional bias in major depressive disorder. Advances in Psychological Science, 16(2), 260-265.

Eckhardt, C. I., & Cohen, D. J. (1997). Attention to anger-relevant and irrelevant stimuli following naturalistic insult. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(4), 619-629.

Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681-700.

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.

Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369-1385.

Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 1-23.

Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. (2001). Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774-788.

McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435-442.

Karpinski, A., & Lytle, J. (2005). Measuring implicit gender attitudes, gender identity, and self-esteem using the single category implicit association test (Unpublished master’s thesis). Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.

Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 16-32.

Kelley, T. L. (1939). Selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17-24

Li, J. H. (2013). Attentional bias in individuals with different level of implicit / explicit aggression: Behavior and brain mechanism (Master’s thesis). Available from CNKI Dissertations and Theses database.

MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of ABNORMAL PSYCHology, 95(1), 15-20.

Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 565-584.

Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 14-29.

Peng, X. Z., & Zhou, X. L. (2005). Emotional information and attentional bias. Advances in Psychological Science, 13(4), 488-496.

Wang, G. (2011). A research on attentional bias to information with different emotional valences in college students with different affective styles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Yu, F., & Guo, Y. Y. (2009). On the relationship between attentional bias and attribution bias of aggressors. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(4), 821-828.

Zhang, K. (2010). Experimental research on the relation between interpersonal relationship and implicit aggression among college students (Master’s thesis). Available from CNKI Dissertations and Theses Database.

Zhang, L., & Wu, X. Y. (2011). The characteristics of attention bias and impulse control. Psychological Exploration, 31(2), 128-132.

Zhou, Y. (2007). On the influence factors and mechanism of implicit aggression (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Wanfang Dissertations and Theses database.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/7438

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or [email protected] for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture