Incentive Mechanisms of Altruistic Behavior With Social Preference Introduced and the Effects Comparison
Abstract
Under the assumption of rational person, the provision of altruistic behavior will eventually be exhausted. However, in reality, some people still would rather sacrifice their own interests to help others. This paper introduces altruistic social preference into utility function, researches on how to push the upgrade of altruistic behavior in the society through designing the incentive mechanism while realizing the maximum of individual interest and social welfare. This paper divides the individuals into individuals with high, middle and low altruistic levels and analyzes the effects of different incentive mechanisms on these three kinds of individuals. Finally, this paper comes to the comparative analysis on the policy effects by combining the effects of the proportion of the individuals with different altruistic levels in the group on the aggregate provision of altruistic behavior.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bowles, S., & Reyes, S. P. (2012). Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? Journal of Economic Literature, 502, 368-425.
Bowles, S., & Hwang, S.-H. (2008). social preferences and public economics: mechanism design when social preferences depend on incentives. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1811-1820.
Bowles, S., & Hwang, S.-H. (2014). Optimal incentives with state-dependent preferences. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 16(5), 681-705.
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137-140.
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1-17.
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115( 3), 791-810.
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-78.
Hirschman, A. O. (1985). Against parsimony: Three ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. Economics and Philosophy, 1(1), 7-21.
Lin, C., & Yang, C. C. (2006). Fine enough or don’t fine at all. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 59, 195-213.
Siciliani, L. (2009). Paying for performance and motivation crowding out. Economics Letters, 103,
68-71.
Titmuss, R. M. (19971). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. Pantheon Books, New York, USA.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/7572
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Canadian Social Science
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture