The Degree of Using Alternative Assessment Strategies by the Teachers of the First Three Grades in the Tabuk Region: Survey Study

Essa Joudallah Al-Harbi

Abstract


The main aim of this study is to find out the degree of employment of alternative assessment strategies in the first three grades’ teachers at schools in Tabuk region. The sample of the study includes (75 male teachers and 95 female teachers) the total number of the sample is 165 subjects. The instrument of the study was developed based on the alternative assessment strategies. The psychometric characteristics of the instrument of the studies were determined. The results of the study showed that the most often used strategy by teachers is the paper and pencil strategy. Then the strategy of self-correction. The least used strategy is the observation strategy. The study also showed that female and male teacher’s estimation of the degree of employment was in general about average/in the middle. This study showed that there were no significant differences in the degree of employment of alternative assessment strategies among the first three grades’ teachers due to gender or experience. Nevertheless, there are significant differences in the degree of employment of the strategy of performance, paper and pencil and communication strategies due to the grade of the students. The study recommended conducting further studies on alternative assessments studies

Keywords


Strategies; Alternative assessment strategies; First three grades

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R. S., & Specks B.W. (1998). Authentic assessment. New Jersey: Dale Seymour Publication.

Arter, J. A., Spandel, V., & Culham, R. (1995). Portfolios for assessment and instruction. ERIC Digest. EDRS NO: ED388890.

Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: dilemmas, decisionjs, and directions. Heinle & Heinle: US.

Birjandi, P., & Tamjid, N. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy through self- and peer assessment. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(5), 245-251.

Dietel, R. J., Herman, J. L., & Knuth, R. A. (1991). What does research say about assessment? NCREL, Oak, Brook. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/4assess.htm

Hamayan, E. V. (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212-226.

Huerta-Marcias, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Response to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5(1), 8-11.

Kulieke, M., Bakker, J., Collins, C., Fennimore, T., Fine, C., Herman, J., ...Tinzmann, M. B. (1990). Why should assessment be based on a vision of learning? [online document] NCREL, Oak Brook: IL. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/assess.htm

Law, B., & Eckes, M. (1995). Assessment and ESL. Peguis publishers: Manitoba, Canada.

Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Welch, W. (2001). The science achievement of various subgroups on alternative assessment formats. Science Education, 85, 279-290.

Margulies, B., & Ghent, C. (2005). Alternative assessment strategy and its impact on student comprehension in an undergraduate microbiology course. Microbiology Education, 6(1), 3-7.

McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: the effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 209-220.

Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Educational Computing Research, 3(1), 101-111.

Sidek, H. (2012). EFL reading instruction: communicative task based approach. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 109-128.

Simonson M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Assessment for distance education (ch 11). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Wangsatorntanakhun, J. A. (1997). Designing performance assessments: Challenges for three-story intellect [online document]. Teaching with internet. Retrieved from http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/8658/

Wikström, N. (2007). Alternative assessments in primary years of international baccalaureate education. The Stockholm Institute of Education, Master theses Stockholm University.

Winking, D. (1997). Critical issue: Ensuring equity with alternative assessments, [online document]. NCREL (North Central Regional Educational Laboratory), Oak Brook: IL. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/methods/assment/as800.htm

Wubshet, H., & Menuta, F. (2015). Investigating the practice of alternative assessment in English classrooms: The case of selected grade nine English teachers assessment practices. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 8(4), 159-171. Retrieved [DATE] from http://www.ijsre.com




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Canadian Social Science



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture