Contributions for a Community Good: Results from a Field Experiment in India

Santanu Mitra, Gautam Gupta

Abstract


This paper presents the results of a field experiment on voluntary contribution for a proposed community good. The experiment was conducted at village Sundarika, District South 24 parganas, in West Bengal, India. The proposed community good was a community medicinal plant garden. Solicitation letters, on behalf of a local Community Based Organization (CBO), were delivered to one hundred households by the experimenters with the request to contribute generously for the proposed garden. Sixty-five households contributed and a strong positive association is found between contributions and CBO membership on the one hand and landholding on the other.

Keywords


Community good; Field experiment; VCM; social capital

References


Andreoni, J. (1998). Towards a theory of charitable fund-raising. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 106(6), 1186-1213. Örebro: Econpaper.

Andreoni, J. (2006). Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(1), 1-22. Örebro: Econpaper

Baland, Jean-Marie &, Platteau, Jean Philippe (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources. New York: FAO & Clarendon Press Oxford.

Bowles, S. (2005). Microeconomics- behavior, institution and evolution. India: Oxford University Press.

Dasgupta, P. (2005). Common property resources: Economic analytics. Economic and Political Weekly, XL(16), 1610-22. Mumbai: Sameeksha Trust.

Frey, Bruno S. & Stephan Meier (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing conditional cooperation in a field experiment. American Economic Review 94(5), 1717-1722. Pittsburgh: American Economic Association.

Glaeser, Laibson, Sacerdote (2002). An economic approach to social capital. The Economic Journal,112, F437- F458.Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

Harrison & Rutstroem (2001). Doing it both ways – experimental practice and heuristic context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 413-414. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

List, J. A. & D. Lucking-Reiley (2002). The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 215-233. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Meier, Stephan (2005). Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics. Zurich: University of Zurich.

Mitra, S & Gupta,G. (2009). The logic of community participation: Experimental evidence from west bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, XIV(20), 51-57. Mumbai: Sameeksha Trust.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720130903.5758

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or [email protected] for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture