Infusing Bodily Connotations Into Storytelling Instruction: A Discussion Grounded in Embodied Cognitive Theory

Yongfei ZHANG

Abstract


Reforms in the theory and practice of curriculum and instruction should be based on changes in their theoretical foundation of cognitive theories. Traditional cognitive science has long been stuck in the confines of Cartesian dualism: the intact human being is divided into body and mind; cognitive computationalism and information processing theories have been prevalent. The computational metaphor of cognition advocates a “disembodied” kind of cognition and devalues bodily connotations. This approach has also impacted our fundamental understanding of issues in education and instruction; the theory and practice of storytelling instruction inevitably head down the wrong path as well due to the influence of this approach. Embodied cognitive theory is a new direction in contemporary philosophy and research in cognitive sciences; its emphasis on the cultural, integral, and affective nature of cognition infuses bodily connotations into our understanding of cognition. This new theoretical approach would also reveal new implications for the theory and practice of storytelling instruction.

Keywords


Storytelling instruction; Embodied cognition; Cultural nature; Integral nature

Full Text:

PDF

References


Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345-351.

Damasio, A. (2007). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. In C. Mao (Trans.). Beijing, China: Education Science Press.

Doll, W. (2000). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. In H. Wang (Trans.). Beijing: Education Science Press.

He, J. (2009). Body image and body schema: A study of embodied cognition (Doctoral dissertation). Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.

Jaspers, K. (1991). What is education. In J. Zou (Trans.). Beijing, China: Joint Publishing Press.

Kelly, K. (2010). Out of control: Mankind’s ultimate fate and destiny. In X. Chen, et. al. (Trans.). Beijing, China: New Star Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). Phenomenology of perception. In Z. Jiang (Trans.). Beijing, China: The Commercial Press.

Peng, D. (2001). General psychology. cHINA: Beijing Normal University Press.

Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2001). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. In G. Li (Trans.). Haikou, China: Hainan Publishing House.

Stepper, S., & Strack F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 211-220.

Varela F., Thompson, E., & Rosch E. (2010). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. In H. Li, et al. (Trans.). Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/6562

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Share us to:   

Reminder

  • We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

  •  The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

  •  Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or  [email protected]  for consideration. 

  • We look forward to receiving your work.

 

 Articles published in Studies in Sociology of Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:[email protected]

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures