Design Thinking Exploration From Three Disciplines That Influence Industry Development

Yunyao GU, Siyi HE, Xinye LIN

Abstract


This essay examines how design thinking impacts three different disciplines and fields via comparing the growing development on its definition during its extensive integration. Specifically, the comparison ranges from visual perception to the product development; in a larger scale, from management of individual organizations to social and global area.
A few cases are utilized to elaborate the core design and development activities on product development, including the utilization of sketching in visual art, global business extension of Ford Motor Company. Then, by combining how design thinking speeds up the innovation in various industries, observations from the surveys and researches are also enlisted to generalize improvements achieved within certain aspects of the system. Furthermore, to sustain a better future environment, design thinking calls for more commitment in sustainability, especially in social and global aspects.


Keywords


Design thinking; Discipline; Perception; Management; Sustainability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. Design Thinking for Innovation. Springer International Publishing.

Fountain, J. (2013).Implementing cross-agency collaboration: A guide for federal managers. Washington, D.C.: IBM Center for The Business of Government.

Growth, P. D. (n.d.). Ford launches major product acceleration in Europe: Targets profitable growth with new cars, suvs and cvs. Ford of Europe.

Kalargiros, E. M., & Manning, M. R. (2015). Divergent thinking and brainstorming in perspective: Implications for organization change and innovation. Research in Organizational Change & Development, 23, 293-327.

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 134-147.

López, A., & Luis, A. (2014). Incorporating the innovation process in a product development organization. Engineering Systems Division System Design and Management Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2016). Design thinking in policymaking processes: Opportunities and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(3), 391-402.

Newcomb, M. (2012). Sustainability as a design principle for composition: Situational creativity as a habit of mind. College Composition & Communication, 63(4), 593-615.

Pautz, M. C., & Schnitzer, M. H. (2008). Policymaking from below: The role of environmental inspectors and publics. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(4), 450-475.

Tschimmel, K. (2006). Design thinking as an effective toolkit for innovation. Transplantation, 82(1), 414-420.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10765

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or [email protected] for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture