Backwash in Higher Education: Calibrating assessment and swinging the pendulum From Summative Assessment

Abdallah GHAICHA, Youssef OUFELA

Abstract


Now more than ever, there exists a plethora of empirical evidence to uphold that examinations used in educational institutions have a backwash effect, a well-recognized phenomenon among applied linguists, educators and teachers, which is the effect of test on teaching and learning (Alderson & Wall, 1993; Bailey, 1999; Messick, 1996; Widen et al., 1997; Hughes, 2003; Yi-Ching, 2009). This article essentially targets this phenomenon in Moroccan higher education. It seeks to provide a concise theoretical framework to render the reader au fait with such an unfamiliar term. It aims at examining the extent to which higher education assessments affect EFL students’ academic achievements through sketching examples from the summative assessment practices used by faculty instructors at Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco. It also aims at suggesting some pedagogical implications to harness teaching and learning in Moroccan higher education.


Keywords


backwash (washback); summative assessment; higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2000). The effect of high-stakes testing on students’ learning and motivation. Educational leadership. 31-38.

Bailey, K. (1999). Washback in language testing. TOEFL monograph series. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bachman, L. F. (1991). What does language testing have to offer? TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 671-704.

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beardsley, A., & Berliner, D. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32-38.

Becker, B. (1990). Coaching for the SAT: Further synthesis and appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 60, 373-417.

Black, P. (2000). Research and the development of educational research. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3), 407-418.

Black, P. (1998). Formative assessment: Raising standards. School Science Review, 80(291), 39-46.

Black, P., & Williams, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.

Buck, G. A., & Amy E. Trauth-Nare. (2009). Preparing teachers to make the formative assessment process integral to science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 475-494.

Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38-54.

Cheng, L. (1999). Changing assessment: washback on teacher perspectives and actions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(3), 253-271. doi:10.1016/ S0742-051X(98)00046-8

Cheng, L. (2003). Looking at the impact of a public examination change on secondary classroom teaching: a Hong Kong Case Study. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 38(1), 1-10.

Cheng, L. (2004). The washback effect of a public examination changes of teachers’ perceptions toward their classroom teaching. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research Contexts and methods (pp. 147-170). Manwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cheng, L., & Couture, J. C. (2000). Teachers’ work in the global culture of performance. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 65–74.

Harlen W., Deakin, C. R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning. Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jawhar, S. (2009). Summative & formative assessment: reflection on the Saudi higher education assessment system. Enletawa Journal, 2, 85-98.

Kuo, T. M., & Hirshman, E. (1996). Investigations of the testing effect. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 45-464.

Kuze, M. W., & Almun Shumba. (2011). An investigation into formative assessment practices of teachers in selected schools in fort beaufort in South Africa. Journal of Social Science, 29(2), 159-170.

Latham, H. (1877). On the action of examinations considered as a means of selection. Cambridge, Deighton, Bell and Company.

Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256. doi:10.1177/026553229601300302

Popham, W. J. (1987). The merits of measurement-driven instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 679-682.

Rees, P. J. (1986). Do medical students learn from multiple-choice examinations? Medical Education, 20, 123-125.

Roediger, H. L., & Marsh, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative consequences of multiple choice testing. Journal of Experimental psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition. 31(5), 1155-1159. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155

Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: a critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Pearson.

Weathly, L., McInch, A., Flemming, S., & Lord, R. (2003). Feeding back to feed forward: formative assessment as platform for effective learning. Kentucky Journal of Higher Education, Policy and Practice, 3(2),
1-29.

Widen, M. F., O’Shea, T., & Pye, I. (1997). High-stakes Testing and the Teaching of Science. Canadian Journal of Science, 22, 428-444.

Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic Practice. Higher education, 45(4), 477-501.

Yi-Ching, P. (2009). A review of washback and its pedagogical implications. VNU Journal of Science, 25, 257-263.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11905

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or [email protected] for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture