The Use of Too as a Pragmatic Presupposition Trigger

Qiang KANG

Abstract


This paper is intended to make a detailed study of too in the framework of presupposition. It aims to probe its use as a presupposition trigger bordering in semantics and pragmatics. In so doing, it is hoped to solve a great many problems which can not be convincingly pervasive in traditional grammar. In pragmatics, too is considered as a pragmatic presupposition trigger. It can express the discriminational meaning in everyday conversation. At the same time, too also plays an essential role in textual organization and information flow in discourse.

Key words: Presupposition triggers; Pragmatic presupposition; Textual organization


Keywords


Presupposition triggers; Pragmatic presupposition; Textual organization

References


Allerton, D. J. (1979). Essentials of Grammatical Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Anderson, S. (1972). How to Get Even. Language, 48, 893-906.

Atlas, J. (1977). Negation, Ambiguity and Presupposition. Linguistics and Philosophy, I, 321-336.

Beaugrande, R. de & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.

Bickerton, D. (1979). Where Presuppositions Come from. Syntax and Semantics, 11, 235-248.

Burton-Roberts, N. (1989). Theories of Presupposition. Journal of Linguistics, 25, 437-454.

Caffi, C. (1994). Pragmatic Presupposition. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 6, 3320-3327.

Chomsky, N. (1972). Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.

Coulthard, M. (1977). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Crystal, D. (1992). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Padstow: T. J. Press.

Donnellan, K. S. (1966). Reference and Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75, 281-304.

Ducrot, O. (1972). Direetnepasdire. Paris: Hermann.

Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6(3), 353-392.

Fillmore, C. (1971). Verbs of Judging: An Exercise in Semantic Description. Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 272-289.

Giora, R. (1997). Discourse Coherence and Theory of Relevance: Stumbling Blocks in Search of a Unified Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 81-133.

Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.

Givon, T. (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.

Green, G. (1989). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. New Jersey: LEA Publishers.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Cassel.

HE, Zhaoxiong (2000). The General Survey of Pragmatics.Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

HE, Ziran (1988). The General Survey of Pragmatics. Changsha: Hunan Education Press.

Hoeksema, J., & Zwarts, F. (1991). Some Remarks on Focus Adverbs. Journal of Semantics, 8, 51-70.

Jacobsen, B. (1978). Transformational-generative Grammar. Holland: North-holland Publishing Company.

James, C., & Fernald, L. H. D. (1947). Funk & Wagnalls, Standard Haycook of Synonyms, Antonyms, and Prepositions. New York: Funk & Wagnalls Company.

Karttunen, L. (1971). Implicative Verbs. Language, 47, 340-358.

Karttunen, L., & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional Implicatures in Montague Grammar. Syntax and Semantics, 11, 1-56. New York: Academic Press.

Keenan, E. L. (1971). Quantifier Structures in English. Foundations of Language, 7(2), 225-284.

Kempson, Ruth, M. (1975). Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kempson, Ruth, M. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kripke, S. (ms.). Presupposition.

Leech, G. (1983). Semantics: The Study of Meaning. Great Britain. Richard Clay (The Chauser Press) Ltd.. Bungay: Suffolk.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Poutsma, H. (1904-1928). A Grammar of Late Modern English (Vol. 1). P. Noordhoff: Groningen.

Prince, E. F. (1978). A Comparison of WH-clefts and It-clefts in Discourse. Language, 54(4), 883-906.

Quirk et al. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longmans.

Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus (Doctoral dissertation). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

Rusussel, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14, 479-93.

Saeed, J. I. (2000). Semantics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Seuren, P. (1985). Discourse Semantics. London: Basil Blackwell Ltd..

Seuren, P. (1994). Accommodation and Presupposition. In R. Asher & J. Simpson (Eds.), the Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergammon Press.

Seuren, P. (1994). Presupposition, in Asher, R.&J.Simpson (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistic. Oxford: Pergammon Press.

Soames, S. (1989). Presupposition. Handbook of Philosophical Logical, W, 553-616.

Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447-457.

Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic Presuppositions. Semantics and Philosophy (pp. 197-214). New York: New York University.

Strawson, P. F. (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen.

Strawson, P. F. (1950b). On Referring. Mind, 59, 320-344.

Van der Sandt, R. (1988). Context and Presupposition. London Croom Helm Series.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1981). Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.

Vennemann, T. (1975). Topic, Sentence Accent, and Ellipsis: A Proposal or Their Formal Treatment. Formal Semantics of Natural Language (pp. 313-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Werth, P. (1984). Focus, Coherence, and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm.

Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in Applied Linguistics(1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1979). Ordered Entailments: An Alternative to Presuppositional Theories. Syntax and Semantics, 11, 299-323.

Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.

Zeevat, H. (1992). Presupposition Arid Accommodation in Update Semantics. Journal of Semantics, 9, 379-412.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120806.9333

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or [email protected] for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:[email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture