Mind Bombs: Searching for Truth in the Great Debate Between Einstein and Bohr

Timothy McGettigan

Abstract


Albert Einstein is regarded by many as perhaps the greatest scientist of the 20th century. Yet, one of his most enduring legacies is the monumental debate that he lost over the issue of quantum mechanics. Time and again, Einstein focused every bit of his extraordinary intellect on numerous efforts to undermine quantum mechanics only to fail on each and every occasion. While Einstein’s reputation among his fellow physicists may have suffered as a result, his efforts, nonetheless, did much to advance the field of physics—and also, I argue, to sustain a commitment to good science.

Keywords


Einstein; Bohr; Quantum mechanics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakalis, N. (2005). Handbook of Greek philosophy: From thales to the stoics. Victoria, B.C.: Trafford.

Barnett, V. (2006). Understanding stalinism: The “Orwellian Discrepancy” and the “Rational Choice Dictator”. Europe-Asia Studies, May.

Bergin, M. (2006). Junk science. World Magazine, 21(8).

Bertlmann, R. A., & Zeilinger, A. (Eds.). (2002).Quantum [Un]speakables: From bell to quantum information. Berlin: Springer.

Bohr, N. (1928). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. In The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr: Volume 1—Atomic theory and the description of nature. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.

Born, M. (2005).The born—Einstein letters 1916-1955: Friendship, politics and physics in uncertain times. New York: Macmillan.

Clegg, B. (2006). The God effect: Quantum entanglement, science’s strangest phenomenon. New York: MacMillan.

Clegg, B. (2009). Before the Big Bang: The prehistory of our universe. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Clough, P. T. (1994). Feminist thought: Desire, power and academic discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Denzin, N. K., &Yvonna, S. L. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Einstein, A. (1950). Out of my later years. New York: Philosophical Library.

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780.

Folsing, A. (1997). Albert Einstein: A biography. London: Viking.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. C. Gordon (Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.

Garwood, C. (2008). Flat earth: The history of an infamous idea. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.

Greene, B. (1999). The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. New York: W. W. Norton.

Hawking, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. New York: Bantam Books.

Heisenberg, W. (1930). The physical principles of the quantum theory.C. Eckart & F. C. Hoyt. (Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Isaacson, W. (2007). Einstein: His life and universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Kaku, M. (2004). Einstein’s cosmos: How Albert Einstein’s vision transformed our understanding of space and time. New York: W. W. Norton.

Kumar, M. (2008). Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the great debate about the nature of reality. New York: W.W. Norton.

Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

Landsberger, H. A. (1958). Hawthorne revisited: Management and the worker: Its critics, and developments in human relations in industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Lemert, C. (Fall, 1991). The end of ideology, really. Sociological Theory, 9(2), 164-172.

Lyng, S., & David, D. (2002). Franks.Sociology and the Real World. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.

McGettigan, T. (2006). Redefining reality: A resolution to theoretical paradox in the field of sociology. Electronic Journal of Sociology, Tier One. Retrieved from www.sociology.org/content/2006/tier1/mcGettigan_RedefiningReality.pdf

Ohanian, H. C. (2008). Einstein’s mistakes: The human failings of genius. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Overbye, D. (2006, October 24). Knowing the universe in detail (Except for That Pesky 96 Percent of It). New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2006/10/24/science/- space/24essa.html

Panek, R. (2011). The 4% universe: Dark matter, dark energy, and the race to discover the rest of reality. Richmond: Oneworld.

Popper, K. (1957). The poverty of historicism. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Popper, K. (1965). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

Popper, K. (1983). Realism and the aim of science. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.

Popper, K. (1999). All life is problem solving. (Trans. by P. Camiller.). New York: Routledge.

Rhodes, R. (1986). The making of the atomic bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Richardson, L. (Fall, 1991). Postmodern social theory: Representational practices. Sociological theory, 9(2), 173-179.

Seidman, S. (Fall, 1991). The end of sociological theory: The postmodern hope. Sociological Theory, 9(2), 131-146.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.sss.1923018420130403.2796

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Share us to:   

Reminder

  • We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

  •  The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

  •  Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or  [email protected]  for consideration. 

  • We look forward to receiving your work.

 

 Articles published in Studies in Sociology of Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:[email protected]

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures