Energy Science and Technology
Techno-economical and Environmental Study of Utilizing Alternative Fuel and Waste Heat Reuse in a Cement Plant
Abstract
In this work, a cement plant was simulated to estimate heat losses and pollution emission in the process. Also, a waste heat recovery system was introduced to use two main sources of heat losses, i.e. flue gas and hot air streams and produce steam and power. Moreover, the use of natural gas as an alternative to the current energy source, fuel oil, was studied in two cases, associated with and without waste heat recovery system. Results showed that 34.28% of initial energy was lost in the base case, 48% of which is from flue gas and hot vent air streams. Also, changing the fuel source from fuel oil to natural gas results in CO2 emission rate to decrease from 118,693 to 115,367 kg/hr, and emission of NO2 and SO2 was reduced to nearly 100%. In addition to environmental benefits, economical analyses suggest the use of waste heat recovery system as well as change of fuel for this plant.
Key words: Cement plant; Waste heat recovery; Alternative fuel; HYSYS simulation; Air pollution reduction
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Conesa, J.A., Galvez, A., Mateos, F., Martin-Gullon, I., & Font, R. (2008). Organic and Inorganic Pollutants from Cement Kiln Stack Feeding Alternative Fuels. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 158, 585-592.
[2] Engin, T., & Ari, V. (2005). Energy Auditing and Recovery for Dry Type Cement Rotary Kiln Systems, a Case Study. Energy Conversion and Management, 46 (4), 551-562.
[3] Gabel, K., & Tillman, A.M. (2005). Simulating Operational Alternatives for Future Cement Production. Cleaner Production, 13, 1246-1257.
[4] Hendriks, C.A., Worrell, E., Price, L., Martin, N., & Ozawa Media, L. (1999). The Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emission from the Cement Industry. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D programme.
[5] Research institute of petroleum industry. (2010). Iran, Ripi.
[6] Kaantee, U., Zevenhove, R., Backman, R., & Hupa, M. (2004). Cement Manufacturing Using Alternative Fuels and the Advantages of Process Modeling. Fuel Processing Technology, 85, 293-301.
[7] Kabir, G., Abubakar, A.I., & El-Nafaty, U.A. (2010). Energy Audit and Conservation Opportunities for Pyroprocessing Unit of a Typical Dry Process Cement Plant. Energy, 35, 1237-1243.
[8] Khurana, S., Banerjee, R., & Gaitonde, U. (2002). Energy Balance and Cogeneration for a Cement Plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 22, 485-494.
[9] Marshall & Swift Equipment Cost Index, Marshall & Swift. (2010). Retrieved from http://web.ist.utl.pt/~ist11061/de/IndPrecos/Che-2010_04_Econ-Indic.pdf
[10] Mintus, F., Hamel, S., & Krumm, W. (2006). Wet Process Rotary Cement Kilns: Modeling and Simulation. Clean Techn Environ Policy, 8, 112-122.
[11] Mokrzycki, E., Bochenczyk, A.U., & Sarna, M. (2003). Use of Alternative Fuels in the Polish Cement Industry. Applied Energy, 74, 101-111.
[12] Mujumdar, K.S., & Ranade, V.V. (2006). Simulation of Rotary Cement Kilns Using a One-Dimensional Model. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 84(A3), 165-177.
[13] Nazmul, H. (2005). Techno-Economic Study of CO2 Capture Process for Cement Plants (Master dissertation, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada). Retrieved from http://etd.uwaterloo.ca/etd/s5hassan2005.pdf
[14] Peters, M.S., Timmerhaus, K.D., & West, R.E. (2003). Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. In M.S. Peters (5th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[15] Pipilikaki, P., Katsioti, M., Papageorgiou, D., Fragoulis, D., & Chaniotakis, E. (2005). Use of Tire Derived Fuel in Clinker Burning. Cement & Concrete Composites, 27, 843-847.
[16] Prisciandaro, M., Mazziotti, G., & Veglio, F. (2003). Effect of Burning Supplementary Waste Fuels on the Pollutant Emissions by Cement Plants: a Statistical Analysis of Process Data, Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 39, 161-184.
[17] Rasul, M.G., Widianto, W., & Mohanty, B. (2005). Assessment of the Thermal Performance and Energy Conservation Opportunities of a Cement Industry in Indonesia. Applied Thermal Engineering, 25, 2950-2965.
[18] Rovira, J., Mari, M., Nadal, M., Schuhmacher, M., & Domingo, J.L. (2011). Use of Sewage Sludge as Secondary Fuel in a Cement Plant: Human Health Risks. Environment International, 37, 105-111.
[19] Sögüt, Z., Oktay, Z., & Karakoç, H. (2010). Mathematical Modeling of Heat Recovery from a Rotary Kiln. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30, 817-825.
[20] U.S.A, Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:1990-2008.
[21] Wang, J., Dai, Y., & Gao, L. (2009). Exergy Analyses and Parametric Optimizations for Different Cogeneration Power Plants in Cement Industry. Applied Energy, 86, 941-948.
[22] Zabaniotou, A., & Theofilou, C. (2008). Green Energy at Cement Kiln in Cyprus-Use of Sewage Sludge as a Conventional Fuel Substitute. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 531-541.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.est.1923847920110201.642
DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Share us to: 
Reminder
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Articles published in Energy Science and Technology are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
ENERGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures