A Tentative Study of How to Improve the Effectiveness of Classroom Interaction

Yanfang LU

Abstract


The effectiveness of English learning and teaching is the ultimate goal of English education. Yet in China, English teaching is far from being effective. There is a lack of effective interaction between teacher and students in class. Using the framework of Conversation Analysis, this thesis summarizes four most frequently used classroom interaction models and their characteristics. Then it proposes some strategies on how to improve classroom interaction, they are: Clarification Requests, Confirmation Checks, Comprehension Checks, Conversational Adjustments, Partial, Exact, Expanded, and Total Self-Repetition, Partial, Complete, Expanded, and Total Other-Repetition.
Key words: Effectiveness; English teaching; Conversation Analysis

Keywords


Effectiveness; English teaching; Conversation Analysis

References


Allwright, R.L (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156-171.

Barnes, D. & F. Todd (1977). Communication and learning in small groups, (pp.63-64). London: Routledge Kogan Paul.

Burton (1981). Analyzing spoken discourse. In Coulthard and Montgomery (eds.), 63.

Dajin Lin, Chaoqun Xie (2003). Interactional linguistics: Developments and prospects. Modern Foreign Language, 26(4), 410-418.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar word, 17/3, (pp. 241-292). Reprinted in Kress, G. (ed.) 1976.

Hang Li. (2008). The study of effective teaching and its inspiration to foreign language teaching, Foreign Language World, 1, 33-39

Long, Michael, H, & Charlene, J. Sato (1983). Classroom foreign talk discourse: Forms and functions of teacher’s questions, (pp. 268 – 285). In Selinger, H. W. and Long, M. H, eds. Classroom: Originated research in second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.

Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff & G. Jeffersonl (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.

Schegloff, E.A., E. Ochs & S.A. Thompson. (1996). Introduction, (pp. 1-51). In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (eds.). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sinclair, J. M. and M. Coulthard (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils,(pp.19-59). London: Oxford University Press.

Yue’er Li, Hongya Fan (2002). Discourse analysis, (pp. 16-18). Shanghai: Shanghai Publishing House of Foreign Language Education.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Share us to:   

 

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to [email protected]，or  [email protected]  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture